We know from Carwin’s confession to Clara that the first
time he used his skill with the Wieland and Pleyel families was when he was in
the family tower and found the note addressed to Wieland (pg. 192). This note
contained the information about the land that Wieland inherited in Europe. It
is here that Carwin decides to acquire the inheritance. But the only way to do
that is to dispose of Wieland and those who know if the inheritance. My theory
is that the rest of the novel is Carwin’s scheme to kill people off and driving
others crazy in order to obtain a large fortune with no complications.
Carwin easily disposes of Katherine and the kids
through Wieland, so they were no problem. Pleyel had to be convinced to stay in
America in order to not visit the inherited land. Carwin’s way of accomplishing
this is was by convincing Pleyel that his lover had died (pg.193). Without her,
Pleyel wouldn’t have a reason to go abroad.
Wieland was also easily taken care of because Carwin
took advantage of Wieland’s devout faith. Carwin led Wieland through a mental
breakdown and caused him to kill himself. Now for the toughest to convince,
the rational Clara. I believe Clara is the reason why Carwin’s plan failed. In
a sense, Clara’s interest in Pleyel led Carwin astray from his scheme. When
Carwin learned of Clara’s affection towards Pleyel, he began to mess with her. If
Carwin had ignored Clara he may have been able to accomplish his plan.
I know that this theory is farfetched, but this is
what I saw and fully believed to be true. As I read the novel I expected the ending
to bring up some sort of scheme that Carwin planned. What other reason would
this man have to cause so much distress to a family? The idea of natural
perverseness, as seen in “The Black Cat by Edgar Allen Poe, does seem to apply.
Perhaps Poe got the idea of natural perverseness after reading Wieland, or
the Transformation. Or perhaps Carwin was really an accomplished thief and Wieland’s
fortune was his next target.
ReplyDeleteI like your take on Carwin's true intentions and after reading your blog, some of things you brought up do seem to connect and create this image of Carwin that labels him as a thief who has interest in others' large fortunes. The fact that Carwin possessed this ability of ventriloquism gave him the power to indirectly influence those that he wished to, essentially controlling a person. To say that he indirectly caused this whole chain of unfortunate events regarding Wieland and his murdering is in my opinion fair to say. However, to say that all of what Carwin did was for the sake of reaping some large fortune without any repercussions is like you said “farfetched”.
One big reason why I believe this theory might be a little too “farfetched” is because if Carwin really was in the game to take Wieland’s territory, then why would he have not just let Clara die in the end when Wieland was about to kill her? If Wieland had died, then the inheritance of the land in Europe would fall to Clara. Thus, for Carwin to completely carry out his maniacal plan he would have to take out the entire Wieland family, including Clara. Adding to this, Carwin could have taken the letter when he had the chance and disappeared to Europe. The Wielands weren’t going to move to Europe, and Carwin even made sure that Pleyel didn’t leave for Europe by using his “voice” to update Pleyel and Wieland that the Baroness was dead. Even though Carwin was somewhat wary of the feelings between Clara and Pleyel, in the end I think that it was his curiosity of her that drew him in, rather than the pure joy of messing with her.